Immigrants from South Africa vs Ukrainian 3 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,251,888 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of households with 3 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,145,260 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and percentage of households with 3 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 0.68%.

3 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Africa	Ukrainian
Minimum	17.5%	2.3%
Maximum	85.5%	100.0%
Range	68.0%	97.7%
Mean	29.8%	29.5%
Median	27.3%	25.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	21.3%	20.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.7%	33.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.4%	13.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.4%	17.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.3%	17.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Ukrainians by 3 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 3 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Kiowa (19.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Syrian (19.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Western Europe (19.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and Iroquois (19.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Peruvian (19.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (19.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cameroon (19.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Iraqi (19.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (19.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	3 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Lebanon	67.6 /100 \| #160	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	65.6 /100 \| #161	Good 19.7%
Estonians	63.2 /100 \| #162	Good 19.7%
Chileans	63.0 /100 \| #163	Good 19.7%
Yugoslavians	62.9 /100 \| #164	Good 19.7%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	61.9 /100 \| #165	Good 19.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	60.9 /100 \| #166	Good 19.7%
Ukrainians	58.9 /100 \| #167	Average 19.6%
Peruvians	58.8 /100 \| #168	Average 19.6%
Immigrants \| Denmark	57.6 /100 \| #169	Average 19.6%
Iraqis	56.0 /100 \| #170	Average 19.6%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	53.2 /100 \| #171	Average 19.5%
Kiowa	50.9 /100 \| #172	Average 19.5%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	50.2 /100 \| #173	Average 19.5%
Immigrants \| South Africa	50.0 /100 \| #174	Average 19.5%
Syrians	47.0 /100 \| #175	Average 19.5%
Iroquois	46.0 /100 \| #176	Average 19.4%
Immigrants \| Peru	41.1 /100 \| #177	Average 19.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	40.3 /100 \| #178	Average 19.4%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	38.9 /100 \| #179	Fair 19.3%
South Africans	37.5 /100 \| #180	Fair 19.3%