Immigrants from Lebanon vs Bhutanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Bhutanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Bhutanese
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Bhutanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,871,197 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,743,315 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 3.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.89% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 17.3% | 49.5% |
Range | 16.4% | 48.0% |
Mean | 6.4% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.7% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon and Bhutanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Cajun (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Lithuanian (8.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (8.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |