Immigrants from England vs Yugoslavian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Yugoslavian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from England
Yugoslavians
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Yugoslavian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,853,276 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,290,646 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 3.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 20.9% |
Range | 35.3% | 20.0% |
Mean | 10.2% | 7.2% |
Median | 7.5% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 9.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Yugoslavians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Lebanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Seminole (9.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Pakistani (9.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Asian (9.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Bulgarian (9.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Slavic (9.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |