Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Congo No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Congo
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Congo
16.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Congo No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,031,652 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,060,649 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 66.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Congo |
Minimum | 0.49% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 47.6% | 31.7% |
Range | 47.1% | 30.9% |
Mean | 10.8% | 10.2% |
Median | 7.5% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Ghana (16.6%, a difference of 0.86%), Ghanaian (16.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Alaska Native (17.4%, a difference of 3.9%), Soviet Union (17.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and Cypriot (15.7%, a difference of 6.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.6% |
Albanians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.7% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.4% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 19.6% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |