English vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
English
Subsaharan African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
English
Sub-Saharan Africans
6.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,648,684 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of English and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,014,655 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 87.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | English | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 37.8% |
Range | 29.8% | 35.0% |
Mean | 7.8% | 14.2% |
Median | 5.3% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to English by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to English are Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Danish (6.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), German (6.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and African (12.3%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.5% |