Crow vs Iroquois No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Crow
Iroquois
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Crow
Iroquois
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
14.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
17.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Iroquois No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,160,516 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,994,531 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.81%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 26.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.1% | 98.5% |
Mean | 8.2% | 10.1% |
Median | 6.4% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Iroquois by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Immigrants from Western Asia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Apache (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Romanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 12.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 11.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 10.6 /100 | #215 | Poor 11.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 10.6 /100 | #216 | Poor 11.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 10.2 /100 | #217 | Poor 11.2% |