Comanche vs Hungarian 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Comanche
Hungarian
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Comanche
Hungarians
56.5%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
56.5%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Hungarian 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,768,112 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688 and weighted average of 56.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,946,107 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 56.5%, a difference of 0.070%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Hungarian |
| Minimum | 48.2% | 5.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 51.8% | 94.8% |
| Mean | 68.7% | 63.4% |
| Median | 69.4% | 64.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.3% | 47.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.4% | 79.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 32.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 24.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Hungarians by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Bulgarian (56.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from the Azores (56.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Blackfeet (56.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Yugoslavian (56.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Ute (56.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Bulgarian (56.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (56.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Ute (56.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (56.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 92.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Australians | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| New Zealanders | 91.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Tsimshian | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Estonians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Ute | 90.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Bulgarians | 89.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Hungarians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Comanche | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Blackfeet | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 86.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Cubans | 84.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Salvadorans | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Armenians | 84.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Latvians | 83.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 56.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 83.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 56.2% |
| South Africans | 83.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 56.2% |