Chilean vs Nicaraguan 1 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chilean
Nicaraguan
1 or more Vehicles in Household
1 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chileans
Nicaraguans
90.2%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
90.4%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Nicaraguan 1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,602,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 90.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,615,163 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118 and weighted average of 90.4%, a difference of 0.27%.
1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Nicaraguan |
Minimum | 81.6% | 74.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 18.4% | 25.6% |
Mean | 93.6% | 91.6% |
Median | 93.9% | 92.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 90.5% | 89.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 97.2% | 95.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Nicaraguans by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Bahamian (90.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bahamas (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Sioux (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (90.1%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Marshallese (90.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Burmese (90.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (90.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Africa (90.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Syria (90.4%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
Burmese | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 90.4% |
Marshallese | 88.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 90.4% |
Nicaraguans | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 90.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 90.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 88.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 90.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 90.4% |
Kenyans | 87.0 /100 | #134 | Excellent 90.4% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 86.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 90.4% |
Hungarians | 86.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 90.3% |
Latvians | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 90.3% |
Syrians | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 90.3% |
Estonians | 85.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 90.3% |
Sudanese | 85.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 90.3% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 81.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 90.2% |
Sioux | 81.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 90.2% |
Bahamians | 80.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 90.2% |
Chileans | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 90.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 78.2 /100 | #148 | Good 90.1% |