Turkish vs Laotian Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Turkish
Laotian
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Comparison
Turks
Laotians
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
18.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Laotian Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,589,805 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,153,669 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%.
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Laotian |
Minimum | 0.40% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 12.6% | 22.8% |
Range | 12.2% | 20.8% |
Mean | 5.3% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Demographics Similar to Turks by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Syrian (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Arab (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Sri Lankans | 87.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
Australians | 87.1 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | England | 86.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
Iranians | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 85.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chileans | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Syrians | 85.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Turks | 84.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Ukrainians | 84.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 84.4 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Arabs | 84.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
New Zealanders | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Panama | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Cherokee | 81.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Pakistan (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Argentineans | 29.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.2% |
Costa Ricans | 27.0 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.2% |
Immigrants | Poland | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 22.5 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.2% |
Maltese | 19.6 /100 | #198 | Poor 5.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 19.0 /100 | #199 | Poor 5.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 18.4 /100 | #200 | Poor 5.2% |
Laotians | 18.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 17.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 5.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 16.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.2% |
South American Indians | 15.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.2% |
German Russians | 14.7 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.2% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 13.2 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.2% |
Uruguayans | 12.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.2% |