Thai vs Creek Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
COMPARE
Thai
Creek
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Comparison
Thais
Creek
15.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 16 TO 19 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 16 TO 19 YEARS
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Creek Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,293,569 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,206,941 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 9.3%.
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Creek |
Minimum | 3.9% | 6.8% |
Maximum | 36.6% | 66.7% |
Range | 32.7% | 59.9% |
Mean | 13.9% | 21.3% |
Median | 12.8% | 17.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
Demographics Similar to Thais by Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Swiss (15.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Sudanese (15.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Somali (15.7%, a difference of 0.24%), German (15.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (15.8%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Yugoslavians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Finns | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Pakistani (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and German Russian (17.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 17.1% |
Immigrants | Laos | 88.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 17.1% |
Syrians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 17.2% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 86.7 /100 | #126 | Excellent 17.2% |
Pakistanis | 85.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 17.2% |
Australians | 85.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 17.2% |
Creek | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 17.2% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 84.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 17.2% |
German Russians | 84.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 17.2% |
Arabs | 83.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 17.2% |
Laotians | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 17.2% |
Potawatomi | 83.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 17.2% |
Samoans | 83.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 17.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 83.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 17.2% |