Sudanese vs Scotch-Irish Unemployment
COMPARE
Sudanese
Scotch-Irish
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Sudanese
Scotch-Irish
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Scotch-Irish Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,101,890 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,559,279 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.555 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.11%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 58.0% |
| Range | 12.6% | 56.8% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 11.3% |
| Median | 4.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Scotch-Irish by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Zimbabwean (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bolivia (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Croatian (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Bolivia (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Croatian (4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Cubans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Irish | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |