Sudanese vs Immigrants from Venezuela Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,864,294 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.550 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,107,059 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Venezuela and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 2.8%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Sudanese	Immigrants from Venezuela
Minimum	0.70%	1.3%
Maximum	18.5%	12.5%
Range	17.8%	11.2%
Mean	5.3%	4.7%
Median	4.3%	4.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.3%	3.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.2%	5.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.9%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.1%	2.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.1%	2.2%

Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Immigrants from Venezuela by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Danish (4.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (4.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Norwegian (4.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Chickasaw (4.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.3%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Venezuela are Cuban (4.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (4.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (4.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Iraq (4.5%, a difference of 0.33%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 4.3%
Chickasaw	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.3%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.3%
Sudanese	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.3%
Danes	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 4.4%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 4.4%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 4.4%
Afghans	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 4.4%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Zaire	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 4.4%
Yugoslavians	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 4.4%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Iraq	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Nepal	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 4.5%
Cubans	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 4.5%
Zimbabweans	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 4.5%