South American vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Female Unemployment
COMPARE
South American
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
South Americans
Immigrants from Afghanistan
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
8.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Immigrants from Afghanistan Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 490,205,488 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,540,381 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Immigrants from Afghanistan |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 11.0% | 13.1% |
Range | 9.8% | 10.4% |
Mean | 5.4% | 5.8% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Immigrants from Afghanistan by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Comanche (5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Brazilian (5.5%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Brazil (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Creek (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
Comanche | 10.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |
Peruvians | 9.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 5.4% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 5.4% |
South Americans | 8.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 8.5 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.4% |
Brazilians | 7.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.5% |
Nicaraguans | 7.2 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.5% |