South African vs Romanian Unemployment
COMPARE
South African
Romanian
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
South Africans
Romanians
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Romanian Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,514,846 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.869 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,537,614 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Romanian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 14.7% | 13.0% |
Range | 11.3% | 10.5% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.0% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Romanians by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Chilean (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (5.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from England (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Serbia (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
South Africans | 92.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Argentineans | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 91.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.1% |