Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Spain Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,757,324 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,232,971 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 0.98%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Luxembourger	Immigrants from Spain
Minimum	3.8%	3.6%
Maximum	100.0%	51.6%
Range	96.2%	48.0%
Mean	19.7%	13.5%
Median	16.8%	9.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.0%	6.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.1%	14.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	16.2%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	22.3%	12.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	21.7%	12.1%

Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Immigrants from Spain by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Norway (7.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Hungary (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kiowa (7.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Ugandan (7.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Colville (7.7%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are British West Indian (7.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (7.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Pueblo (7.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 7.8%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%