Lithuanian vs Celtic Unemployment
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Celtic
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Lithuanians
Celtics
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Celtic Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,273,270 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,747,363 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 14.3% |
Range | 14.4% | 13.9% |
Mean | 5.7% | 5.5% |
Median | 4.7% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Celtics by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Northern European (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Filipino (4.8%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Singapore (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and White/Caucasian (4.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Australians | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |