Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Italy Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Italy
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Italy
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
75.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Italy Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,024,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,110,337 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.88%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Italy |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 7.6% | 23.1% |
| Range | 4.8% | 21.1% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 8.8% |
| Median | 4.9% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.98% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.84% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Italy by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Greece (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |