Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from China Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Immigrants from China
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Immigrants from China
5.3%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
70.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from China Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,027,535 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,688,998 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 3.3% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 13.2% | 10.0% |
Range | 9.9% | 6.6% |
Mean | 5.6% | 5.3% |
Median | 5.4% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from China by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Peru (5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Iraq (5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Osage (5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Iran (5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 71.5 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
Indonesians | 71.2 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 71.0 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 70.6 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 65.9 /100 | #162 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 65.7 /100 | #163 | Good 5.2% |
Afghans | 62.0 /100 | #164 | Good 5.3% |
South Americans | 60.6 /100 | #165 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 60.2 /100 | #166 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 57.7 /100 | #168 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Congo | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 54.1 /100 | #170 | Average 5.3% |
Peruvians | 51.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Russia | 50.7 /100 | #173 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 48.1 /100 | #175 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 44.6 /100 | #177 | Average 5.3% |
Osage | 42.5 /100 | #178 | Average 5.3% |