Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Spaniard Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Spaniard
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Spaniards
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
20.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Spaniard Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,480,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,755,407 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.449 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 0.37%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Spaniard |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 13.8% | 46.6% |
| Range | 13.2% | 45.3% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 8.6% |
| Median | 5.4% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Spaniards by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Immigrants from Colombia (5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Alsatian (5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (5.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Tsimshian (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Arab (5.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Afghans | 33.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
| Costa Ricans | 33.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
| Ugandans | 31.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
| Cherokee | 30.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
| Portuguese | 28.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Arabs | 27.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.3% |
| Colombians | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
| Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
| Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
| Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |