Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Potawatomi Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Potawatomi
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Potawatomi
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
76.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Potawatomi Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,937,877 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,685,766 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.663 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.080%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 0.80% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 10.7% | 23.9% |
Range | 9.9% | 22.0% |
Mean | 5.0% | 6.5% |
Median | 4.9% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Potawatomi by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Italy (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Palestinians | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.4 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
Sri Lankans | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 66.7 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 66.6 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
Laotians | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |