Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Norway Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from France
Immigrants from Norway
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from France
Immigrants from Norway
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Norway Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,167,055 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,500,173 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.33%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from France | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 57.1% |
Range | 48.9% | 56.6% |
Mean | 8.8% | 7.8% |
Median | 5.4% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Norway by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |