Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Argentinean Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Argentinean
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Argentineans
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Argentinean Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,397,412 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,046,481 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.284 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.74%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Argentinean |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 48.1% | 9.0% |
| Range | 47.7% | 7.4% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 4.5% |
| Median | 4.7% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Argentineans by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from England (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Serbia (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are South African (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Chilean (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (5.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| South Africans | 92.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 91.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.1% |