Fijian vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
COMPARE
Fijian
Chinese
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Comparison
Fijians
Chinese
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 30 TO 34 YEARS
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 30 TO 34 YEARS
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,070,500 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,021,968 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Fijian | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 33.8% | 22.6% |
Range | 32.8% | 21.1% |
Mean | 9.4% | 6.0% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Chinese by Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Immigrants from Vietnam (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Sri Lankan (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Serbia (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from China (5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Cuban (5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (5.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Sri Lankans | 99.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Fijians | 99.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 98.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 98.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 98.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yugoslavians | 98.6 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Cypriots | 98.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 98.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 98.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Turks | 98.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 98.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Cubans | 98.1 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chinese | 97.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.4 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | China | 97.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.1% |