Czech vs Lumbee Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Czech
Lumbee
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Czechs
Lumbee
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Lumbee Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,691,190 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,752,030 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 4.2%.
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Lumbee |
Minimum | 0.70% | 0.30% |
Maximum | 44.1% | 13.9% |
Range | 43.4% | 13.6% |
Mean | 8.8% | 6.3% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 10.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Lumbee by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Macedonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Norwegian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Bulgarian (5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Iraqi (4.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Ethiopian (5.0%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Cuban (4.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Osage (4.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and Chickasaw (4.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Creek | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Lebanese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Iraqis | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Macedonians | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.0% |