Cuban vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
COMPARE
Cuban
Czechoslovakian
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Cubans
Czechoslovakians
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,752,139 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.570 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,083,136 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.89%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 7.6% | 40.9% |
| Range | 6.4% | 39.6% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 7.8% |
| Median | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Czechoslovakians by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Polish (4.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Finnish (4.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Croatian (4.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Zimbabwean (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Bolivian (4.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Scotch-Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Lithuanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Northern European (4.8%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Thais | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| British | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Cubans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Irish | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |