Creek vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Creek
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from Oceania
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,704,441 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.90% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 29.1% |
Range | 15.8% | 27.9% |
Mean | 6.1% | 7.9% |
Median | 5.2% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Creek by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Choctaw (5.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |