Comanche vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,076,031 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 228,793,193 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.54%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Comanche	Immigrants from South Africa
Minimum	5.8%	3.1%
Maximum	84.6%	33.3%
Range	78.9%	30.2%
Mean	22.4%	14.7%
Median	13.6%	14.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.9%	11.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.5%	16.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.6%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	21.9%	7.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	21.3%	6.8%

Demographics Similar to Comanche and Immigrants from South Africa by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Romanian (10.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from North America (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Burmese (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Hungarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Iranian (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Romania (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Austrians	83.9 /100 \| #133	Excellent 10.2%
Romanians	83.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 10.2%
Comanche	83.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	82.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| North America	82.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 10.2%
Burmese	82.3 /100 \| #138	Excellent 10.2%
Uruguayans	81.9 /100 \| #139	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Austria	81.4 /100 \| #140	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Azores	81.4 /100 \| #141	Excellent 10.2%
Slovaks	80.2 /100 \| #142	Excellent 10.2%
Immigrants \| Jordan	79.0 /100 \| #143	Good 10.2%
Brazilians	78.4 /100 \| #144	Good 10.2%
Argentineans	78.0 /100 \| #145	Good 10.2%
Asians	77.7 /100 \| #146	Good 10.2%
French Canadians	77.5 /100 \| #147	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Romania	75.7 /100 \| #148	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Scotland	74.6 /100 \| #149	Good 10.2%
Hungarians	74.4 /100 \| #150	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| South Africa	73.6 /100 \| #151	Good 10.2%
Iranians	72.4 /100 \| #152	Good 10.2%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	71.4 /100 \| #153	Good 10.2%