Chinese vs Tongan Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Tongan
Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Comparison
Chinese
Tongans
4.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 35 TO 44 YEARS
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 35 TO 44 YEARS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Tongan Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,522,420 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,138,894 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 3.6%.
Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Tongan |
Minimum | 0.80% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 30.5% | 25.7% |
Range | 29.7% | 24.4% |
Mean | 5.2% | 5.0% |
Median | 4.1% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 4.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Tongans by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Carpatho Rusyn (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Pakistan (4.3%, a difference of 0.14%), European (4.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Czech (4.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bolivian (4.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Cuban (4.2%, a difference of 0.77%), Swedish (4.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Cubans | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Paraguayans | 99.6 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Scandinavians | 99.5 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.5 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.3 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.3 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.3 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.3 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.2 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Chinese | 99.1 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.1 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.3% |