Chinese vs Panamanian Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Panamanian
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Comparison
Chinese
Panamanians
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
43.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Panamanian Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,562,312 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.255 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,913,860 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 23.0%.
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Panamanian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 11.9% | 33.4% |
Range | 10.9% | 32.2% |
Mean | 4.5% | 8.7% |
Median | 3.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Hmong (4.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Fijian (4.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Sudanese (4.4%, a difference of 5.0%), Chickasaw (4.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Italy (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Serbia (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 49.8 /100 | #175 | Average 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 46.6 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
Icelanders | 45.9 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 44.8 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 44.0 /100 | #179 | Average 5.2% |
Russians | 43.6 /100 | #180 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 43.5 /100 | #181 | Average 5.2% |
Panamanians | 43.0 /100 | #182 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 42.1 /100 | #183 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 41.6 /100 | #184 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Iran | 36.0 /100 | #185 | Fair 5.2% |
Americans | 35.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.2% |
Somalis | 33.5 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 33.2 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.2% |
Bangladeshis | 32.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.2% |