Chinese vs Osage Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Osage
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Chinese
Osage
4.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Osage Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,031,641 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,928,141 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.510 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 6.1%.
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Osage |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 13.1% | 8.4% |
Range | 12.1% | 7.9% |
Mean | 4.8% | 4.4% |
Median | 4.2% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Osage by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Fijian (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Tsimshian (4.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Sudanese (4.6%, a difference of 3.5%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Chickasaw (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Comanche (4.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Creek | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.8% |