Chinese vs Arab Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Arab
Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Comparison
Chinese
Arabs
6.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 25 TO 29 YEARS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 25 TO 29 YEARS
82.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Arab Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,787,303 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,763,852 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arabs and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 6.6%.
Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Arab |
Minimum | 0.40% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 66.7% |
Range | 21.8% | 63.7% |
Mean | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 11.3% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Yugoslavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Filipino (6.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Morocco (6.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (6.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Taiwanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years |
New Zealanders | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 99.7 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 6.0% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 6.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Filipinos | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Chinese | 99.6 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Yugoslavians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Taiwanese | 99.5 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.5 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Ethiopians | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Indonesians | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Arabs by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Syrian (6.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Brazilian (6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Laotian (6.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Dutch (6.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 85.7 /100 | #117 | Excellent 6.5% |
Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #118 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 84.9 /100 | #119 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 84.5 /100 | #121 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 6.5% |
Laotians | 83.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 6.5% |
Arabs | 82.5 /100 | #124 | Excellent 6.5% |
Syrians | 82.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 6.5% |
Brazilians | 81.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 6.5% |
Dutch | 80.6 /100 | #127 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Chile | 80.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 6.5% |
Sri Lankans | 80.3 /100 | #129 | Excellent 6.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.9 /100 | #130 | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 79.2 /100 | #131 | Good 6.5% |