Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Lithuanian
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Comparison
Chickasaw
Lithuanians
6.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 30 TO 34 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 30 TO 34 YEARS
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,279,410 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 389,471,500 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%.
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 55.4% |
Range | 57.4% | 53.7% |
Mean | 11.1% | 12.7% |
Median | 7.6% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 16.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 11.3% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Spanish American (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), American (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Seminole (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.1% |
Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.1% |
Haitians | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.2% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.3% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from North America (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Greece (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Serbian (5.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Russian (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years |
Carpatho Rusyns | 77.3 /100 | #132 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 77.3 /100 | #133 | Good 5.3% |
Bangladeshis | 76.6 /100 | #134 | Good 5.3% |
Palestinians | 75.1 /100 | #135 | Good 5.4% |
Pakistanis | 74.6 /100 | #136 | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 74.6 /100 | #137 | Good 5.4% |
Serbians | 72.9 /100 | #138 | Good 5.4% |
Lithuanians | 72.4 /100 | #139 | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants | North America | 72.2 /100 | #140 | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 72.1 /100 | #141 | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants | Greece | 72.0 /100 | #142 | Good 5.4% |
Russians | 71.1 /100 | #143 | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 71.0 /100 | #144 | Good 5.4% |
Syrians | 70.3 /100 | #145 | Good 5.4% |
Celtics | 70.2 /100 | #146 | Good 5.4% |