Burmese vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 396,748,426 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,080,232 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 0.93%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Burmese	Immigrants from Belarus
Minimum	0.60%	1.3%
Maximum	15.4%	19.0%
Range	14.8%	17.6%
Mean	5.6%	6.0%
Median	5.0%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.4%	4.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.0%	6.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.6%	2.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.0%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.9%	3.7%

Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Belarus by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Welsh (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cambodia (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (5.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Korea (5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Australian (5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Germany (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Welsh	96.5 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 5.2%
Burmese	96.4 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 5.2%
Japanese	96.4 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	96.3 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	95.9 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 5.2%
Yugoslavians	95.5 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 5.2%
Iranians	95.2 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 5.2%
Malaysians	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 5.2%
Austrians	94.5 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	94.1 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Singapore	93.9 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	93.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 5.2%
Sri Lankans	92.7 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	92.4 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Germany	91.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 5.3%
Asians	91.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Turkey	90.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 5.3%
Australians	90.4 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	90.2 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Belarus	90.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 5.3%