British vs Burmese Male Unemployment
COMPARE
British
Burmese
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
British
Burmese
4.8%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Burmese Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 524,963,712 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of British and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,600,368 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Burmese |
Minimum | 2.2% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 10.7% |
Range | 26.5% | 10.2% |
Mean | 7.8% | 4.6% |
Median | 5.8% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 5.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to British and Burmese by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to British are Sudanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Scottish (4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Bulgarian (4.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and Latvian (4.8%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Scotch-Irish (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chinese (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.8% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |