Argentinean vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Argentinean
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Argentineans
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,580,968 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,603,268 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.61%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.70% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 12.4% |
| Range | 15.2% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 4.9% |
| Median | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Maltese (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |