Argentinean vs Immigrants from Bolivia Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,769,726 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,395,742 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 2.5%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Argentinean	Immigrants from Bolivia
Minimum	2.2%	1.6%
Maximum	64.0%	32.5%
Range	61.8%	30.9%
Mean	12.2%	8.7%
Median	7.4%	7.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.6%	4.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.6%	9.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.0%	5.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.4%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.3%	6.7%

Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Immigrants from Bolivia by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Italy (7.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Armenian (7.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kenya (7.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Serbian (7.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and South African (7.3%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from Uganda (7.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Armenia (7.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Ukrainian (7.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Swedish (7.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and Slovene (7.4%, a difference of 0.54%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Argentineans	96.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Italy	96.1 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 7.2%
Armenians	95.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Kenya	95.4 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 7.3%
Serbians	94.5 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 7.3%
South Africans	94.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 7.3%
Iraqis	93.9 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| Chile	93.5 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	93.5 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| Zaire	93.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| South Africa	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 7.3%
Pakistanis	92.2 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 7.3%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	91.9 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 7.3%
Jordanians	91.5 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 7.3%
Zimbabweans	91.5 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 7.3%
Slovenes	89.2 /100 \| #129	Excellent 7.4%
Swedes	88.4 /100 \| #130	Excellent 7.4%
Ukrainians	88.2 /100 \| #131	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Armenia	87.4 /100 \| #132	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Uganda	86.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 7.4%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	85.7 /100 \| #134	Excellent 7.4%