Arapaho vs Zimbabwean Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Arapaho
Zimbabwean
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Arapaho
Zimbabweans
5.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Zimbabwean Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,847,458 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.435 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,414,209 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 2.2% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 28.3% |
Range | 26.4% | 25.4% |
Mean | 11.1% | 7.8% |
Median | 7.6% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Zimbabweans by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Liberian (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Cheyenne (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and British West Indian (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Aleut (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bahamas (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (5.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from El Salvador (5.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (5.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 5.8% |
Armenians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 5.8% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 5.8% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 5.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 5.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 5.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 5.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 5.9% |
Venezuelans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 5.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 5.9% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 5.9% |
Zimbabweans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 5.9% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 5.9% |