Yakama vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Yakama
Zimbabwean
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Yakama
Zimbabweans
22.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,893,282 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 22.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,153 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 55.8%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 5.7% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 26.5% |
Range | 74.3% | 25.4% |
Mean | 29.2% | 11.1% |
Median | 26.3% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.2% | 16.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.9% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.1% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.7% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Yakama by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Cajun (22.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Kiowa (22.2%, a difference of 0.39%), U.S. Virgin Islander (22.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Honduran (22.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Dominica (21.9%, a difference of 0.91%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.7% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Sweden (14.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (14.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Scandinavian (14.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Belgium (14.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Zimbabweans | 98.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Laotians | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.0 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.3% |