Yakama vs African Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
African
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Africans
15.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs African Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,879 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,483,422 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 7.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | African |
Minimum | 5.5% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.9% | 99.2% |
Mean | 16.6% | 21.5% |
Median | 13.8% | 17.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 25.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Africans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Colville (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Kiowa (15.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Dutch West Indian (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Somali (14.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Seminole (14.3%, a difference of 0.58%), Creek (14.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and Honduran (14.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 14.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 14.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |