Ute vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Ute
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,601,048 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,936,047 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 31.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac |
Minimum | 4.2% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 32.8% | 11.2% |
Range | 28.6% | 10.6% |
Mean | 11.0% | 4.3% |
Median | 8.3% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 5.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 2.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ute by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Dutch West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Immigrants from Hungary (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |