U.S. Virgin Islander vs Bolivian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Bolivian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Bolivians
22.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Bolivian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,265,744 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.501 and weighted average of 22.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,239,714 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 62.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Bolivian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.7% |
Range | 97.7% | 47.7% |
Mean | 22.9% | 12.5% |
Median | 22.1% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 15.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 8.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Immigrants from Dominica (22.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Honduran (22.2%, a difference of 0.60%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.82%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Ute (21.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |