Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Chile Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Immigrants from Chile
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Uruguayans
Immigrants from Chile
15.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Chile Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,833,155 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.821 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,328,392 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 9.8% | 9.3% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 54.3% |
Range | 44.7% | 45.0% |
Mean | 23.1% | 22.8% |
Median | 16.1% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.4% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.4% | 13.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Immigrants from Chile by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Belarus (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (15.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Colombia (15.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Argentina (15.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Thailand (15.8%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Fijian (15.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (15.7%, a difference of 0.19%), South American Indian (15.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Australian (15.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Australia (15.7%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Fijians | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Chileans | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.7% |
South American Indians | 96.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Australians | 96.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Immigrants | Australia | 96.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Pakistanis | 95.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Turks | 95.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Africa | 95.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Bulgarians | 94.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.7 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Danes | 94.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Argentineans | 94.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 92.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 92.5 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 92.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.8% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.9% |