Uruguayan vs Chilean Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chilean
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Uruguayans
Chileans
11.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chilean Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,478,006 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,919,497 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 0.19%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Chilean |
Minimum | 8.4% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 69.8% |
Range | 18.9% | 66.0% |
Mean | 14.2% | 19.1% |
Median | 12.4% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.9% | 24.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Chileans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Argentinean (11.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (12.0%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Argentinean (11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Greece (11.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.9%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |