Ukrainian vs Tlingit-Haida Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Tlingit-Haida
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Ukrainians
Tlingit-Haida
4.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ukrainian vs Tlingit-Haida Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,666,258 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.873 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,624,230 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 2.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ukrainian | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 16.3% |
| Range | 98.4% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 5.6% |
| Median | 6.1% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.2% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ukrainians and Tlingit-Haida by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Austria (4.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from England (4.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (4.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Cambodian (4.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from South Africa (4.5%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Okinawan (4.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Australia (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 4.5% |