Ukrainian vs Serbian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Serbian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Ukrainians
Serbians
10.1%
MALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ukrainian vs Serbian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,972,433 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.759 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,465,606 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.47%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ukrainian | Serbian |
Minimum | 4.2% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 20.8% |
Range | 95.8% | 19.8% |
Mean | 18.1% | 9.3% |
Median | 10.5% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ukrainians and Serbians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Austrian (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scandinavian (10.1%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Zimbabwean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |