Ugandan vs Burmese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Burmese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Burmese
5.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
31.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Burmese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,779,769 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,334,774 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 23.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Burmese |
Minimum | 0.62% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 11.5% |
Range | 22.2% | 11.1% |
Mean | 6.3% | 4.1% |
Median | 4.7% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 5.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), South American Indian (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Israeli (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Peruvians | 37.6 /100 | #183 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 35.8 /100 | #184 | Fair 5.3% |
Americans | 35.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 5.3% |
Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |