Ugandan vs Aleut Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ugandan
Aleut
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ugandans
Aleuts
17.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
17.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
28.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Aleut Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,523,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,541,696 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Aleut |
Minimum | 2.1% | 6.6% |
Maximum | 51.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 49.5% | 93.4% |
Mean | 17.1% | 27.1% |
Median | 16.4% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.5% | 34.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 21.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 22.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Aleuts by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Kenyan (16.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |