Turkish vs Immigrants from Hungary Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,666,868 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,436,137 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.500 and weighted average of 19.3%, a difference of 0.98%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Turkish	Immigrants from Hungary
Minimum	2.6%	2.6%
Maximum	46.5%	52.2%
Range	43.9%	49.6%
Mean	17.3%	18.0%
Median	16.9%	16.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.4%	9.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.7%	23.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.3%	13.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.5%	11.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.3%	11.5%

Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Hungary by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Jamaican (19.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North America (19.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Latvian (19.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Canada (19.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slovak (19.5%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Slovene (19.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants (19.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Iran (19.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Cypriot (19.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Slovenes	96.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 19.3%
Immigrants \| Hungary	96.2 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 19.3%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	95.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 19.3%
Immigrants \| Iran	95.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 19.3%
Immigrants \| Guyana	95.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 19.3%
Cypriots	95.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 19.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 19.4%
Guyanese	95.3 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 19.4%
Cambodians	94.6 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 19.4%
Paraguayans	94.6 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 19.4%
Immigrants \| Chile	94.3 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 19.4%
Immigrants \| Panama	94.0 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 19.4%
Immigrants \| Russia	93.7 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 19.4%
Cape Verdeans	93.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 19.4%
Slovaks	92.9 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| England	92.9 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| Canada	92.9 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 19.5%
Latvians	92.7 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 19.5%
Jamaicans	92.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 19.5%
Turks	92.1 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 19.5%
Immigrants \| North America	92.1 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 19.5%