Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Lithuanian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Tsimshian
Lithuanians
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,622,353 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,877,620 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 4.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 6.7% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 40.0% | 99.8% |
Mean | 17.4% | 19.4% |
Median | 14.5% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Lithuanians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Israel (14.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Polish (14.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Greece (13.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (13.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and Italian (13.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Russian (13.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Luxembourger (13.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Immigrants from Australia (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Tsimshian | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.1% |