Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Thailand
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Thailand
13.0%
POVERTY
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,935,515 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 2.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Thailand |
Minimum | 7.3% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 24.7% | 71.4% |
Range | 17.4% | 69.4% |
Mean | 13.9% | 18.3% |
Median | 12.9% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 23.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Immigrants from Thailand by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.82%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.98%), Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from the Azores (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and American (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 16.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 15.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 12.8% |
Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |